API number

47-085-10071

County · district

Ritchie · Clay

Well type

Oil and Gas

Deepest formation

Marcellus Formation shale

Depth

6,250 ft vertical
horizontal about 8,414 ft of lateral (14,664 ft measured)

Field

Bonds Creek

Producing operator

—

Permit number

10071

Surface owner on the permit

—

Logs on file with the survey

None recorded

Production reported to the state, by year

Through month 6 of 2026, the operator reported 65 MMcf of gas, 1,033 barrels of oil, and 9,423 barrels of natural gas liquids from this well (CNX GAS COMPANY LLC). Since 2015 the state has 5.3 Bcf of gas and 25,718 barrels of oil on record for it over 12 reporting years.

The surface tract, and the records behind this well

Surface parcel at this point

KIESSLING TERRENCE FAMILY LIVING TRUST, 82.27 acres
BLACKS RUN
03 · 0006 · 0010.0000

Scanned well logs

None published by the survey

Hydraulic fracturing disclosure

Oct 25, 2014 to Nov 16, 15.6 million gallons of water, 6,250 ft vertical (Noble Energy, Inc.)
Full disclosure on FracFocus

The surface parcel is the county assessor’s record of who owns the land at the marker. Minerals are often severed from the surface and held by someone else; the parcel is a place to start in the deed index, not an answer.

Records on file for this API number

• 2015
  Deviated Original Location: Completed, Noble Energy, Inc.. Mineral owner on permit: Terry & Helen Kiessling et al. Deepest formation Marcellus Formation.

One API number can carry several records: the original location, a deviated location, a recompletion, a plugging. The page summary above uses the most recent.

Around this well

In Clay district of Ritchie County the survey lists 44 permits not yet completed and 7 wells completed since 2025. The largest permit holder in the district is Antero Resources Corporation with 20.

Permitted, not yet completed, in Clay district

Completed since 2025 in Clay district

What this page does and does not tell you

• It does not say who owns the minerals. Only recorded deeds, wills, and estate files do. The mineral owner named on a permit is whoever the operator listed when it filed, often decades ago.
• A completed well is not necessarily producing. Status and year come from state records; the production and sales figures above come from separate, operator-reported filings and are estimates where the page says so.
• Nearby is not yours. A well in the same district is not necessarily producing from your tract. Only a lease, a unit, or a division order ties a well to an interest.
• The location is approximate. A surface point, not a surveyed boundary and not the subsurface path of a lateral.
• Activity is not value. Permits nearby change the odds of future development; they do not by themselves establish what an interest is worth.