API number

47-029-00148

County · district

Hancock · Clay

Well type

—

Deepest formation

—

Depth

—

Field

—

Producing operator

—

Permit number

148

Surface owner on the permit

—

Logs on file with the survey

None recorded

Production reported to the state

No production rows for this API number in the state reports on file here (Operator-reported volumes by well, filed with the state and not audited by it. Annual reports 1985 to 2025, monthly detail since 2016; horizontal wells through month 6 of 2026.). A permitted or plugged well reports nothing; a producing well missing here may have reported under a different API suffix.

The surface tract, and the records behind this well

Surface parcel at this point

ROBINSON GARY A ET AL TRUSTEES, 0.73 acres
41 LENORA LN
03 · 0C24 · 0092.0000

Scanned well logs

None published by the survey

Hydraulic fracturing disclosure

None disclosed. Usual for anything but a shale well.

The surface parcel is the county assessor’s record of who owns the land at the marker. Minerals are often severed from the surface and held by someone else; the parcel is a place to start in the deed index, not an answer.

Records on file for this API number

• 2026
  Plugging: Completed, WVDEP OFFICE OF OIL & GAS.

One API number can carry several records: the original location, a deviated location, a recompletion, a plugging. The page summary above uses the most recent.

Around this well

In Clay district of Hancock County the survey lists 0 permits not yet completed and 21 wells completed since 2025.

Completed since 2025 in Clay district

What this page does and does not tell you

• It does not say who owns the minerals. Only recorded deeds, wills, and estate files do. The mineral owner named on a permit is whoever the operator listed when it filed, often decades ago.
• A completed well is not necessarily producing. Status and year come from state records; the production and sales figures above come from separate, operator-reported filings and are estimates where the page says so.
• Nearby is not yours. A well in the same district is not necessarily producing from your tract. Only a lease, a unit, or a division order ties a well to an interest.
• The location is approximate. A surface point, not a surveyed boundary and not the subsurface path of a lateral.
• Activity is not value. Permits nearby change the odds of future development; they do not by themselves establish what an interest is worth.